Laser Skin Resurfacing Treatments
Maintaining beauty and a youthful appearance date back several thousand
years to the ancient Egyptian. However, the advances in technology have
never before awarded such a choice of modalities. Non-surgical skin
rejuvenation, laser skin resurfacing, wrinkle treatment, fillers, face
lift, and skin tightening are common approaches for improving the look
of your skin. Particularly, the introduction of a multitude of skin
resurfacing devices has caused a lot of confusion amongst consumers.
Among these options, laser skin resurfacing is the most effective non or
semi-invasive surgical approach to achieve drastic results.
First of all you must know that every new resurfacing laser or device is
measured against the industry's most powerful machine for the past 40
years, the carbon dioxide (CO2) laser. It was invented in 1964 and has
been the most widely used laser in medicine. In the area of dermatology,
its use has been predominantly for facial resurfacing. It often
achieves desired results in a single treatment, works on fine and
intermediate lines and acne scars, maximally tightens the skin and
delivers results that last a number of years. Its drawback is a long,
10-14 day social downtime, making it less desirable for any working
person. To overcome this handicap and minimize healing time, many
devices that do not injure the uppermost layers of the skin
(non-ablative) have recently been developed by the aesthetic industry.
The single most important advance was the creation of fractional
technology. Leaving small islands of normal skin behind, the skin
regenerates much faster than with the traditional full ablation of skin.
You will learn about the current industry recognized ablative and non-ablative strategies that rejuvenate your skin and about the benefits and downsides of each of these techniques.
Fractionated Ablative lasers
Carbon Dioxide Laser - CO2 Laser
As an ablative laser, it vaporizes the tissue and is able to eradicate fine and intermediate lines, smoothes overall skin texture and acne scars, eradicates uneven pigmentation as well as tightens the skin. It lets you appear about 10 years younger and often replaces the need for a face lift unless skin sagging is severe. Preparation and postoperative care most closely resembles a full fletched surgical procedure, however, CO2 laser resurfacing can be performed under local anesthesia. The price you pay for the results is one to two weeks of social downtime while the skin reepithelializes. In addition, the resurfaced skin may appear pinkish for several months thereafter.
Fractional CO2 Laser
Since the beginning of 2007, refined systems with partial degrees of ablation that leave small islands of normal skin from which the skin can regenerate much faster, have revolutionized the resurfacing market. Amongst these, the combination of DeepFx and ActiveFx, manufactured by the leader in CO2 technology (Lumenis) give results that most closely compare to the traditional laser resurfacing. For top cosmetic surgeons this new technology offers faster healing times with still excellent results for their patients. In the meantime, a number of laser companies have now developed their own permutations of a fractionated CO2 laser and names include Fraxel re:Pair, Slim MIxto/SX, Exelo 2, Mosaic.
Erbium:YAG Lasers
The traditional erbium laser has produced results that were absolutely comparable to the CO2 laser yet it fell out of favor because of significant post operative bleeding. As with the fractional method developed for the CO2 laser, today's erbium laser treatments are almost exclusively fractionated and may also be called pixelated. Names that you may read about are Pearl, Pixel, ProFractional and Starlux 2940. However, with the exception of the Pearl, these do not deliver results that mirror the original. While downtime is typically limited to 1-4 days, the downfall of most of the fractionated erbium technology is the very superficial nature of the resurfacing results, being excellent at improving sun damage, and skin texture, but will target only the finest lines. They are considered more like an aggressive peel. Several treatments are often necessary to achieve such results. These fractionated lasers do not significantly contribute to skin tightening, removal of wrinkles, let alone acne scars.
Non Ablative Fractional Lasers
Protecting the epidermis, the upper most layer of our skin, and thereby
minimizing social downtime, non-ablative lasers deliver energy in the
lower layers of skin, ideally only causing swelling which is socially
much more tolerable than oozing. Amongst the non-ablative lasers, FRAXEL
is the most marketed. Other brands include Affirm, StarLux-Lux, Mosaic.
Using a wave length lower than that of a CO2 laser, these lasers drive energy into the skin, stimulating collagen production and thereby tightening skin. Results after a single treatment are minimal and it can easily take 4-8 treatments to observe an effect. While its effects on wrinkles and lines after 4-8 treatments is fairly close to the results of a single CO2 laser treatment, it does not seem to deliver on scars as well. In addition, the Fraxel has been FDA approved for the treatment of melasma, also known as the mask of pregnancy, which shows as symmetric pigmentation on the face as a result of sun exposure with increased estrogen levels.
Non-Laser Fractionated Resurfacing Devices
Plasma and radiofrequency devices belong to this category. Because of
the more convincing results, plasma technology will be discussed here.
The plasma device is not based on laser principle. Plasma is pushed into
the skin to induce partial ablation of the epidermis and renewal of
collagen beneath the surface of the skin. Treatments can be delivered in
1-2 aggressive sessions, results mimicking nearly those of fractionated
CO2 laser resurfacing. When energy levels are minimized to allow for as
a little as a few-hour lasting redness, several treatments will be
needed for an effect. With the latter technique however, results tend to
be much less dramatic. Having gained FDA approval in the second half of
2007, the technology is fairly new and long term results are not known
yet.
In sum, many exciting technologies are available nowadays. The general rule of little downtime little results still applies. Non-ablative technology seldom achieves noticeable results in a single treatment and the overall outcome even after several treatments is often below expectations. Ablative devices appear to deliver best, require only a small number of treatments results and social downtime can effectively be lowered by the uses of fractional technology. Ultimately, your goals, your ability to tolerate social downtime and your wallet will steer you and your treating physician to a resurfacing plan that is tailored to you.
Results
CO2 Laser ****
ActiveFX ***
Fractional Lasers **
TCA Peel **
Glycolic Peel *
Microdermabrasion *
Social downtime
CO2 Laser 5-14 days
ActiveFX 3-5 days
Fractional Lasers 1-6 days
TCA Peel 5-7 days
Glycolic Peel None
Microdermabrasion None
# Treatments
CO2 Laser 1
ActiveFX 1-2
Fractional Lasers 4-8
TCA Peel 1
Glycolic Peel 6-8
Microdermabrasion 6-8
Lasting results
CO2 Laser 10 years
ActiveFX 10 years
Fractional Lasers Unknown
TCA Peel 2 years Glycolic Peel 1 year
Microdermabrasion 1 year
Average Cost
CO2 Laser $3000
ActiveFX $3700
Fractional Lasers $5000
TCA Peel $500
Glycolic Peel $700
Microdermabrasion $1000
To learn more on laser treatments ask your anti-aging doctor.
Author Resource:
By Dr. Franziska Ringpfeil, who is the medical director of Ringpfeil Advanced Dermatology - www.ringpfeildermatology.com.

